Are We Living in a Simulation?
“Five arguments that challenge the fabric of reality.” The question isn’t new. Philosophers asked it. Physicists fear it. Tech founders casually mention it on podcasts. But today — in 2025 — the simulation hypothesis is no longer a joke. It is a serious field of scientific debate. Are we living inside a programmed reality? A controlled environment running on laws of physics that look suspiciously like rules in a system? Here are the strongest arguments — for and against — based on real scientific research. 1. The Pixelated Universe Argument “The world feels physical — but the code runs deeper.” At the smallest levels of existence, space isn’t smooth. It appears quantized — divided into tiny, indivisible units. Like pixels. The Planck scale behaves exactly like the minimum resolution in a digital simulation. If the universe is continuous, why does it ...